Deterministic Governance LLC · Wyoming

Verifiable governance for systems that act.

AI reasons in probabilities; the actions it takes demand proof. Deterministic Governance holds the patents for the boundary between the two: architectures that let software prove a decision met policy, cryptographically and before it acts, or fail closed.

Entity
Deterministic Governance LLC
Wyoming Filing
2026-001959648
EIN
33-3380030
Pending Patents
Three · USPTO
§ 01

Thesis

Software that acts on the world should prove it should.

AI systems increasingly take consequential actions: admitting, mutating, exporting, deciding. The decisive question has shifted from "was the model accurate?" to "who authorized this action, under what policy, and can we prove it after the fact?" That is a governance problem, not a model problem.

Deterministic Governance holds the patent applications behind a single discipline for that problem: route every consequential decision through a transactional engine, bind the decision to a cryptographically signed contract, record an auditable trail, and refuse, failing closed, whenever anything cannot be verified.

The result is not a faster model. It is a system whose decisions are replayable, attributable, and tamper-evident. That is the difference between trusting an output and being able to verify one.

The problem

AI acts faster than anyone can verify. An agent can read, write, export, and decide in milliseconds. The exposure is not a wrong answer; it is an unauthorized action no one can trace.

Why policy-and-committee governance falls short

Policies, review boards, and model cards sit beside the system. They record intent. They do not stop an unpermitted action at the instant it executes, nor prove afterward that a permitted one was.

What deterministic governance does

Control moves into the execution path. Every consequential action is checked against policy, cryptographically signed when permitted, recorded either way, and refused when anything cannot be verified.

§ 02

Pending Applications

Three architectures. One discipline.

USPTO 19/544,983

PACDMGS

Probabilistic Admission Control & Deterministic Mutation Governance System

Sign the decision, or escalate to a human.

Issues cryptographically signed decision tokens so a system can prove a decision met policy before any consequential action, or escalates when the evidence is insufficient.

Filed Feb 19, 2026
Docketed, ready for examination
USPTO 19/542,902

PM_DECABS

Persistent Mutation Deterministic Cryptographically Audited Behavioral Substrate

Every authoritative change, recorded and verifiable.

A persistent substrate in which authoritative state mutations are deterministic and cryptographically audited, producing a tamper-evident record of how state came to be what it is.

Filed Feb 18, 2026
Formal requirements complete
USPTO 19/546,587

SEDC

Server-Enforced Deterministic Canonicalization, Profile-Hash Binding, Replay-Verified Export Gating & Fail-Closed Verification State Machine

Canonical, hash-bound, replay-verified exports.

Server-side deterministic canonicalization with profile-hash binding and replay-verified export gating, governed by a fail-closed verification state machine.

Filed Feb 23, 2026
In preexam processing

Assigned to Deterministic Governance LLC · Patent pending.

§ 03

Architecture

Built to be verifiable, not just functional.

Persistence

SERIALIZABLE state

PostgreSQL 16 under SERIALIZABLE isolation, with retry semantics that hold under concurrent commits.

Cryptography

ECDSA P-256

Decisions and audit records are signed with ECDSA P-256; signing keys held AES-256-encrypted, never in source.

State Machine

Fail-closed

Every error path denies, rejects, rolls back, quarantines, or escalates. No path silently passes.

Decision Contract

Signed contract

A signed decision contract binds each decision to its governing policy and the verification evidence behind it, with replay protection.

Audit

Tamper-evident

Every admission decision (admit, escalate, or deny) is recorded as a per-row signed, tamper-evident audit record.

Verification

Replayable

The database schema is bound by SHA-256 and embedded inside signed tokens, so a decision can be re-verified against the exact schema that produced it.

Schema Binding · SHA-256
Each canonical schema is hashed and embedded inside every signed decision token.

Because the schema hash is bound into the signature, a decision can be re-verified against the exact schema that produced it, and any later alteration becomes detectable. Verification is the product, not a feature of it.

§ 04

Commercial

The first vertical is already running.

First commercial vertical

FORGE Talent Connections

The first commercial product built on the FORGE architecture, applying verifiable, governed decisioning to workforce and talent matching.

forgetalentconnections.com →
Architectural principle

Fail Closed

The discipline that threads through all three inventions, stated plainly: when verification cannot be completed, the system refuses rather than guesses.

failclose.com →
§ 05

Standing

Entity, assignment, and record.

Entity of Record

Legal nameDeterministic Governance LLC
JurisdictionWyoming, USA
Filing number2026-001959648
EIN33-3380030
ManagerAndrew L. M. Francisco
Contactops@deterministicgovernance.com

Patent Portfolio

PACDMGS19/544,983
Filed Feb 19, 2026 · Docketed, ready for examination
PM_DECABS19/542,902
Filed Feb 18, 2026 · Formal requirements complete
SEDC19/546,587
Filed Feb 23, 2026 · Undergoing preexam processing

Engage

For counsel, capital, or partnership.

The portfolio and its verification infrastructure are documented and demonstrable. A technical evidence dossier is available on request.